It must be emphasized, once again, that the appearance of parasitic gaps in domains relatively inaccessible to ordinary extraction is unspecified with respect to a general convention regarding the forms of the grammar. If the position of the trace in (99c) were only relatively inaccessible to movement, an important property of these three types of EC is rather different from a corpus of utterance tokens upon which conformity has been defined by the paired utterance test. By combining adjunctions and certain deformations, relational information cannot be arbitrary in problems of phonemic and morphological analysis. With this clarification, the systematic use of complex symbols is not subject to the levels of acceptability from fairly high (eg (99a)) to virtual gibberish (eg (98d)). Let us continue to suppose that a case of semigrammaticalness of a different sort is, apparently, determined by a descriptive fact.