Look On My Words, Ye Mighty, And Despair!

We will bring evidence in favor of the following thesis: a descriptively adequate grammar does not readily tolerate a parasitic gap construction. However, this assumption is not correct, since most of the methodological work in modern linguistics is necessary to impose an interpretation on the requirement that branching is not tolerated within the dominance scope of a complex symbol. To provide a constituent structure for T(Z,K), the earlier discussion of deviance is to be regarded as the levels of acceptability from fairly high (eg (99a)) to virtual gibberish (eg (98d)). Summarizing, then, we assume that an important property of these three types of EC is not quite equivalent to an important distinction in language use. By combining adjunctions and certain deformations, the appearance of parasitic gaps in domains relatively inaccessible to ordinary extraction can be defined in such a way as to impose the traditional practice of grammarians.


Next paragraph (Use RELOAD if the button doesn't work)
What is this all about? How does it work?
How many paragraphs are there?